Black v. Black
Black v. Black
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DANIEL BLACK, No, 73968 Appellant, MAIRE BLACK, VS. FILED Respondent.
SEP 2 5 2017 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK F SUPREME couFrr BY • DEPLOY CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order to release funds in bank accounts frozen by court order. Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; Nathan Tod Young, Judge.
Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the judgment or order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order to release funds from a frozen bank account. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
itAi); Hardesty
Alkept..0 Parraguirre Stigli ch SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ea 17-32.3(03 cc: Hon. Nathan Tod Young, District Judge Daniel Black Law Office of Karen L. Winters Douglas County Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A e 2
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.