IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ZEL NORMAN, No. 70962 Appellant, vs. ISIDRO BACA, WARDEN NNCC, FILED Respondent. OCT 3 0 2017 El-LT-METH A. BROWN CLERK OSUPREME COURT BY 5- IUiVAtt2el r- DEPj

ORDER VACATING AND REMANDING This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge.

Appellant Zel Norman argues that the credits he has earned pursuant to NRS 209.4465 must be applied to his parole eligibility as provided in NRS 209.4465(7)(b) (1997). In rejecting Norman's claim, the district court did not have the benefit of our recent decision in Williams v. State, 133 Nev., Adv. Op. 75, P.3d (2017). 1 There, we held that credits apply to parole eligibility as provided in NRS 209.4465(7)(b) (1997) where the offender was sentenced pursuant to a statute that requires a minimum term of not less than a set number of years but does not expressly mention parole eligibility. Norman is serving a sentence pursuant to such a statute for the offense of failure to stop on signal of a police officer committed on or between July 17, 1997, and June 30, 2007. See NRS

'Having considered Norman's pro se brief and given our decision in Williams, we conclude that a response is not necessary. NRAP 46A(c). This appeal therefore has been submitted for decision based on the pro se brief and the record. See NRAP 34(0(3).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 7- 3749q5 207.010(1)(a) (setting forth sentencing range for offender convicted of a felony and adjudicated as a small habitual criminal). Consistent with Williams, the credits that Norman has earned pursuant to NRS 209.4465 should be applied to his parole eligibility for the sentence he is serving. The district court erred in ruling to the contrary. 2 We therefore ORDER the judgment of the district court VACATED AND REMAND this matter for the district court to reconsider its decision in light of Williams.

J.

Hardesty

ge 'sit Parraguirre Stiglich 444C%-.0 ,J.

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Zel Norman Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Carson City Clerk

2 If Norman has already expired the sentence or appeared before the parole board on the sentence, then the court cannot grant any relief.

Williams, 133 Nev., Adv. Op. 75 at 10 n.7. For this reason, Norman is not entitled to any relief with respect to the sentences for his two convictions of possession of a controlled substance as he has been paroled on both those sentences. It is unclear from the record whether Norman has appeared before the parole board on the sentence for failure to stop on signal of a police officer. The district court may consider any evidence in that respect on remand.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

MI 1947A er, 2