IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LEWIS W. STEWART, No. 71357 Appellant, vs. JAMES E. DZURENDA, DIRECTOR, NDOC; AND HAROLD WICKHAM, FILED WARDEN, WSCC, Respondents. NOV 0 1 2017 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY eic-- DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER VACATING AND REMANDING This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; William A. Maddox, Senior Judge.

Appellant Lewis Stewart argues that the credits he has earned pursuant to NRS 209.4465 must be applied to his parole eligibility as provided in NRS 209.4465(7)(b) (1997). In rejecting Stewart's claim, the district court did not have the benefit of our recent decision in Williams v. State, 133 Nev., Adv. Op. 75, P.3d (2017). 1 There, we held that credits apply to parole eligibility as provided in NRS 209.4465(7)(b) (1997) where the offender was sentenced pursuant to a statute that requires a minimum term of not less than a set number of years but does not expressly mention parole eligibility. Stewart is serving a sentence pursuant to such

'Having considered Stewart's pro se brief and given our decision in Williams, we conclude that a response is not necessary. NRAP 46A(c). This appeal therefore has been submitted for decision based on the pro se brief and the record. See NRAP 34(0(3).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A ca9i.

17- 3133 a statute, see NRS 200.380 (providing sentencing range for robbery), for a robbery committed on or between July 17, 1997, and June 30, 2007. 2 Consistent with Williams, the credits that Stewart has earned pursuant to NRS 209.4465 should be applied to his parole eligibility for that offense.

The district court erred in ruling to the contrary. 3 We therefore ORDER the judgment of the district court VACATED AND REMAND this matter for the district court to reconsider its decision in light of Williams.

J.

Hardesty

1:24ekt"CrT 144tist4-.0 Parraguirre Stiglich cc: Chief Judge, The First Judicial District Court Hon. William A. Maddox, Senior Judge Lewis W. Stewart Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Carson City Clerk

2 Pursuant to the exception set forth in NRS 209.4465(7)(b) (1997), Stewart was not entitled to have credits applied to his parole eligibility for first-degree kidnapping of a victim over 65 years of age because the sentencing statute expressly required that he serve a minimum term before being eligible for parole. See NRS 200.320(2). Additionally, he has discharged the sentence for that offense.

3 If Stewart has already expired the sentence or appeared before the parole board on the sentence, then the court cannot grant any relief.

Williams, 133 Nev., Adv. Op. 75 at 10 n.7. It is unclear from the record whether Stewart has appeared before the parole board on the robbery sentence. The district court may consider any evidence in that respect on remand.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA