Nevada Supreme Court, 2017

Hadley (Ryan) v. Warden

Hadley (Ryan) v. Warden
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided November 3, 2017

Hadley (Ryan) v. Warden

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RYAN E. HADLEY, No. 72744 Appellant, VS. HAROLD WICKHAM, WARDEN, MED Respondent.

NOV 03 2017 ELIZABE11 -1 A. BROWN CLERKA F SUPREME COURT BY D EPUTY e ttedir ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James Todd Russell, Judge.

Appellant Ryan E. Hadley argues that the credits he has earned pursuant to NRS 209.4465 must be applied to his parole eligibility as provided in NRS 209.4465(7)(b) (1997). We recently held in Williams v. State, 133 Nev., Adv. Op. 75, P.3d (2017), that credits earned under NRS 209.4465 apply to parole eligibility as provided in NRS 209.4465(7)(b) (1997) where the offender was sentenced pursuant to a statute that requires a minimum term of not less than a set number of years but does not expressly mention parole eligibility.

Hadley was convicted of second-degree murder with the use of a deaclly weapon and attempted murder with the use of a deadly weapon based on conduct that occurred in 1998. He was sentenced to serve two consecutive terms of 10-25 years in prison for the murder conviction and two consecutive terms of 8-20 years for the attempted murder conviction, with the sentences for both offenses to be served concurrently. Hadley has

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A czOto 17-37785 discharged the concurrent sentences for the primary offenses and is now serving the two concurrent weapon enhancement sentences.

Because Hadley is serving two concurrent sentences, his eligibility for parole from either of the sentences is "based on the sentence which requires the longest period before [he] is eligible for parole." NRS 213.1213(1). The sentence for the weapon enhancement related to the murder conviction requires the longest period before Hadley is eligible for parole-10 years. Hadley therefore is not eligible for parole from the concurrent sentences until he has served the minimum term on the sentence for the weapon enhancement related to the murder. As to that sentence, the sentencing statutes expressly required that Hadley serve the minimum term before he is eligible for parole. See NRS 193.165 (1995) (providing that sentence for weapon enhancement must be equal and consecutive to sentence imposed for primary offense); NRS 200.030(5) (providing that person convicted of second-degree murder shall be punished by imprisonment for "life with the possibility of parole, with eligibility for parole beginning when a minimum of 10 years has been served" or "a definite term of 25 years, with eligibility for parole beginning when a minimum of 10 years has been served"). Therefore, pursuant to the exception set forth in NRS 209.4465(7)(b) (1997), the credits Hadley earns under NRS 209.4465 cannot be applied to his parole eligibility on the concurrent sentences that he is serving See Williams, 133 Nev., Adv. Op.

Tor the same reason, Hadley would not have been entitled to have credits applied to his parole eligibility on the concurrent sentences for the primary offenses. And, contrary to the suggestions in Hadley's brief, the parole board was not required to afford him parole on the murder sentence or the related weapon enhancement after he served the required minimum SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A at 5-10. Accordingly, although some of the analysis in the district court's order conflicts with Williams, we nonetheless affirm the order because the district court reached the correct result in denying the petition. See Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 341 (1970) (stating that an order that reached the correct result will not be reversed simply because it is based on the wrong reason). We therefore ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

R-LtS.41,\ ,J.

Hardesty

PatAer Parraguirre

44k6" J.

Stiglich

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Ryan E. Hadley Attorney GenerallCarson City Carson City Clerk

term. He merely became eligible for parole after serving the required minimum term.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A (4)(W91>

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.