Romero-Laguna (Marco) v. Warden
Romero-Laguna (Marco) v. Warden
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MARCO CESAR ROMERO-LAGUNA, No. 74154 Appellant, vs. BRIAN WILLIAMS, WARDEN, FILED Respondent.
DEC 0 1 2017 FLIZARETH A FPOWN CLERK.W :,WPREME COURT BY '1/ Ci.h&ffl- 4i DEPUTY CLERK
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a decision resolving a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge.
Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.
Specifically, the district court granted appellant the relief he requested in his petition. Thus, appellant is not aggrieved by the order. See NRS 177.015 (only an aggrieved party may appeal). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'
J.
Hardesty
deico bA -C24skaalir Parraguirre Stiglich
'We take no action on appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The filing fee has been waived.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A Cali.
17-91(495 cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge Marco Cesar Romero-Laguna Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A e 2
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.