Sunde v. Ridge

Nevada Supreme Court

Sunde v. Ridge

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF' ]*H STATE OF NEVADA

J. MICHAEL SUNDE, AN No. 74682 INDIVIDUAL; VIKTORIYA SOKOL SUNDE, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND NEVADA QUICK DIVORCE, A SOLE FIL PROPRIETORSHIP, Appellants, JAN 0 8 2018 vs. ELI7-ABETH k BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT TIMOTHY RIDGE, AN INDIVIDUAL, Respondent. BY aldli RK i4a

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a motion to alter or amend an order entered June 6, 2017. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Kathleen M. Drakulich, Judge. Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. u. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion to alter or amend. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire u. Mercer, 111 Nev. 318, 320 n.1, 890 P.2d 785, 787 n.1 (1995), superseded on other grounds by statute as stated in RTIC Comm.& nc, LLC v. Saratoga Flier, Inc., 121 Nev. 34, 110 P.3d 24 (2005). The appeal must be taken from the final judgment. See, e.g., Aids u. State, Gaming Control Bd., 99 Nev. 184, 660 P.2d 980 (1983), disapproved of on other grounds by A4 Primo Builders, LLC u. Washington, 126 Nev.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A (e. ricoo.34, :in 717 578, 245 P.3d 1190 (2010). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Hardesty

cc: Hon. Kathleen M. Drakulich, District Judge J. Michael Sunde Viktoriya Sokol Sunde Lee T. Botch kin, Jr. Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(CP 1.947A 2

Reference

Status
Unpublished