Hamilton v. Viking Ins. of Wis., LLC
Hamilton v. Viking Ins. of Wis., LLC
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
BENNIE HAMILTON, No. 74753 Appellant, VS. Vi RING INSIJRANCE OF WISCONSIN, FILED Respondent. JAN 0 8 2018 ELL2ABE111 A. BROWN CLERlç9 SN1EME COURT BY • DEPUTY CLERK
ORDEI? DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order dismissing appellant's complaint. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge. Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the notice of appeal appears to be untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it appears that it was filed more than thirty days after service of written notice of entry' of the judgment or order. See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c). The order granting respondent's motion to dismiss the complaint was filed and notice of entry served on October 20, 2017. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal until December 13, 2017, well beyond the time allowed for filing a notice of appeal. See NItAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c). An untimely notice of' appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court. Healy v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, 103 Nev. 329, 741 P.2d 432 (1987). SUPREME COURT OF
NEVADA
07) 1947A 17 -0082c0 We conclude, therefore, that we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Cherry
• . °gasman' -raguirre Stiglich
cc: Hon. Rob Bare, Districtiudge Bennie Hamilton Selman Breitman, LEP Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
() ) 711174..9 )A 2 (0) 1947A
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished