Valenzuela (Cesar) v. Warden

Nevada Supreme Court

Valenzuela (Cesar) v. Warden

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CESAR VICTOR VALENZUELA, Appellant, No. 74350 FILE vs. JAN 12 20$ THE STATE OF NEVADA ELIZABETH A. BRO CLERK O F SUPREME OURT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, / Respondent. DEPUTY CLE

CESAR VICTOR VALENZUELA, No. 74351'' Appellant, vs. JO GENTRY, WARDEN; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS

These appeals were initiated by the filing of pro se notices of appeals. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge. Our review of these appeals reveals a jurisdictional defect. The notices of appeals fail to identify any judgments of the district court. To the extent that appellant appeals from the order denying in part the postconviction petitions for writs of habeas corpus, the order is not a final decision because it does not resolve all claims raised in the petition. See NRS 177.015(3). Accordingly, we ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.

Pickering

Gibbon's Hardesty SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 17-0758 (0) 1947A ce cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge Cesar Victor Valenzuela Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2 arms _ 112,1454, Ito 417107,;')-(1),:4 1T441qr;

Reference

Status
Unpublished