Valenzuela (Cesar) v. State, Dep't of Corr.
Valenzuela (Cesar) v. State, Dep't of Corr.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ESAR VICTOR VA LENZUELA, No. 74350 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA JAN 12 21018 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ELIZABETH A. DOWN CLERK OF WPREMB COURT Respondent. DEPUTY C C ESAR VICTOR VALENZUMA, No. 74351 Appellant, vs. JO GENTRY, WARDEN; AND THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS
These appeals were initiated by the filing of pro se notices of appeals. Eighth Judicial District Court. Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, J udge. Our review of these appeals reveals a jurisdictional defect. Me notices of appeals fail to identify any judgments of the district court. To the extent that appellant appeals from the order denying in part the postconviction petitions for writs of habeas corpus, the order is not a final decision because it does not resolve all claims raised in the petition. See NRS 177.015(3). Accordingly, we ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.
Piekti Pickering
, J. SUPREME COURT Hardesty OF NEVADA
(0) t44 7A
31.TWIFFIT cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge Cesar Victor Valenzuela Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 194 7A a....1y# 2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished