State Bar v. Lerner
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
THE STATE BAR OF NEVADA, No. 72925 Petitioner, vs. :
THE SOUTHERN NEVADA
DISCIPLINARY BOARD; AND DAVID
R. FISCHER„ ESQ., SOUTHERN EEG NEVADA DISCIPLINARY HEARING
PANEL CHAIR,
Respondents, and
GLEN J. LERNER, ESQ.,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board Hearing Panel Chairman's decision to deny petitioner's motion for summary adjudication of a bar complaint. Having considered the petition, answer, and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Petitioner has failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that extraordinary writ relief is warranted. Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. 1
J. Hardesty
Parraguirr
, J. Stiglich cc: State Bar of Nevada/Las Vegas
Glen J. Lerner & Associates
Campbell & Williams
Christiansen Law Offices
1 The Honorable Kristina Pickering, Justice, voluntarily recused herself from participation in the decision of this matter.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.