Nevada Supreme Court, 2018

McLynn v. Dist. Ct. (Caesars Entm't Corp.)

McLynn v. Dist. Ct. (Caesars Entm't Corp.)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 15, 2018
McLynn v. Dist. Ct. (Caesars Entm't Corp.)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MEGHAN MCLYNN, No. 74749 Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

LE IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; FEB 15 2018 AND THE HONORABLE RONALD J. EL),ApTH A. EIRDVM -1Er ISRAEL, DISTRICT JUDGE. BY Respondents, CHla bE and

CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT

CORPORATION,

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order granting• without prejudice a motion to dismiss petitioner's tort complaint as to claims against Caesars Entertainment Corporation. Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that petitioner has demonstrated that our extraordinary discretionary intervention is warranted. NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist.t Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d. 849, 851 (1991); see Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (observing that this court generally will not consider writ petitions challenging orders resolving motions to dismiss). Among other reasons, we are not persuaded that an appeal from a final judgment is an

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(CP 1947A e vb- oo n inadequate remedy.' See Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Pickering

J. Gibbons

Hardesty cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge Nersesian & Sankiewicz

Fennemore Craig, P.C./Las Vegas

Fennemore Craig, P.C./Phoenix

Eighth District Court Clerk

"It does not appear that petitioner requested the district court to certify as final the order dismissing her complaint against Caesars Entertainment. Although the decision to grant NRCP 54(b) certification is discretionary with the district court, a properly certified order presents an aggrieved party with an additional adequate remedy at law in the form of an immediate appeal.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) I 947A 4444,b9

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.