Las Vegas Paving Corp. v. Dist. Ct. (Serrano)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LAS VEGAS PAVING CORPORATION, No. 74724 A NEVADA CORPORATION,

Petitioner, vs. FILED THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

FEB 15 2018 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

EU:Zs/WITH BRO're.c.; IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; E 1 ,7IT AND THE HONORABLE WILLIAM D. BY C KEPHART, DISTRICT JUDGE,

Respondents, and

ALEXANDER SERRANO, AN

INDIVIDUAL; FRED TROISIER, AN

INDIVIDUAL; AND MELINDA ESAU,

AN INDIVIDUAL,

Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original petition for writ relief challenges a district court order granting a motion for a good faith settlement determination. Having reviewed the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). In particular, SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) 1947A ei0 we are not persuaded that an appeal from a final judgment is an inadequate legal remedy. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.'

J.

Gibbons

J. Hardesty cc: Hon. William D Kephart, District Judge

Marquis Aurbach Coffing

Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC Lagomarsino Law

Law Offices of Karl H. Smith/Las Vegas

Eighth District Court Clerk

'In light of this order, we deny as moot the stay motion and motion for extension of time to file an opposition to the stay motion.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) 194,I) 2