Haddad v. Abrera (Child Custody)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA RICHARD S. HADDAD. No. 74948

Appellant, vs.

RICAMYR B. ABRERA,

Respondent, 6 2018

ELC:ABETH A. BRCY'AIN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

BY

EG:pur eittrtkAr- This is a pro se appeal from an oral ruling regarding a motion for immediate visitation or supervised visitation and reinstatement of joint custody. Eighth judicial District Court, Clark County; Mathew Harter, Judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. A district court's oral pronouncement from the bench is ineffective and cannot be appealed. State, Div. of Child and Family Servs. v. Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 452, 92 P.3d 1239, 1244 (2004). Further, it does not appear that the district court has entered any written order resolving appellant's motion. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1

, J.

Pickering

Gibbors

Ix Hardesty

1 To the extent appellant appeals from decisions in district court case numbers D-18-563805-R and T-17-183165-T, appellant fails to identify any appealable orders.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(D) 194/A ce cc: Hon. Mathew Harter, District Judge

Richard S. Haddad Roberts Stoffel Family Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A