IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RICHARD S. HADDAD. No. 74948 Appellant, vs. RICAMYR B. ABRERA, Respondent, 6 2018 ELC:ABETH A. BRCY'AIN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY EG:pur eittrtkAr- This is a pro se appeal from an oral ruling regarding a motion for immediate visitation or supervised visitation and reinstatement of joint custody. Eighth judicial District Court, Clark County; Mathew Harter, Judge. Our review of the documents submitted to this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. A district court's oral pronouncement from the bench is ineffective and cannot be appealed. State, Div. of Child and Family Servs. v. Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 452, 92 P.3d 1239, 1244 (2004). Further, it does not appear that the district court has entered any written order resolving appellant's motion. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1

, J. Pickering

Gibbors Ix Hardesty

1 To the extent appellant appeals from decisions in district court case numbers D-18-563805-R and T-17-183165-T, appellant fails to identify any appealable orders. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(D) 194/A ce cc: Hon. Mathew Harter, District Judge Richard S. Haddad Roberts Stoffel Family Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2