Peck v. State, Dep't of Corr.

Nevada Supreme Court

Peck v. State, Dep't of Corr.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

FRANK MILFORD PECK, No. 75171 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; FILED DR. KAREN GEDNEY; DR. MAR; DR. MAR 2 2 2018 EDCOMB; RN, MITCHIL; RN. J. ELIZABETH A. BROWN DANIEL; RN. HENDERSON; CARSON CLERK OF SUPREME COURT CITY CORONER OFFICE; INSPECTOR BY—St_ DEPUTY CLERK ci GENERAL; AND NDOC, Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court's order denying motion to reconsider order denying motion to dismiss. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James E. Wilson, Judge. Our preliminary review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a potential jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b) (listing orders and judgments from which an appeal may be taken). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co.

v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A court rule authorizes an appeal from the above-mentioned order. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Cherry

J. Pairaguirre Stiglich

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Frank Milford Peck Attorney General/Carson City Attorney General/Las Vegas Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2 (0) 1947A

Reference

Status
Unpublished