Brooks v. Bank of America

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MALCOLM BROOKS No. 75595

Appellant, vs.

BANK OF AMERICA,

FIL E S Respondent. MAY 'I 2018 ettpik. BROWN t or RK C c•, - nOIL,00 ,, ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL BY fireaiii uc

This is a pro se appeal form a district court order affirming a judgment of the justice court. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mark B. Bailus, judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district courts have final appellate jurisdiction over cases arising in the justice courts. Nev, Const. art. 6, § 6; see also Waugh v. Casazza, 85 Nev. 520, 521, 458 P.2d 359, 360 (1969). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we therefore

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.' aks2/(yv-y.

Cherry

, J. 41" s4

Pa riagui rre Stiglich

'We deny as moot appellant's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and respondent's motion to dismiss.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

I g - Jr 0(DC WI I 917A ll=111111111S1711 1111 1111 cc: Hon. Mark B. Bailus, District Judge

Malcolm Brooks Rausch, Sturm, Israel, Enerson & Hornik, EEC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A