Nevada Supreme Court, 2018

Russell (Jamelle) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Russell (Jamelle) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided May 15, 2018
Russell (Jamelle) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JAMELLE LEE RUSSELL, No. 75446 Petitioner, vs.

THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE

MAY 1 5 2018 SCOTT N. FREEMAN, DISTRICT

ELIZABETH A. BROWN JUDGE, CLERVE SUPREME COURT Respondents, BY 2 ":"- DEPUTY CLERK- and

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging the district court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence. Because petitioner may raise any suppression issues -on appeal if he is convicted, see NRS 177.01.5(3); NRS 177.045, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.170; Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) ("[T]he right to appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy that precludes writ relief."); see also Smith u. Eighth judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that the issuance of a writ of mandamus is discretionary). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, J. Parraguirre ch /4 Stigli /4" SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A

18 -15,47(p cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District judge

Washoe County Alternate Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) I9(17A

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.