Goodman v. Dist. Ct. (Petrosyan)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ROSS C. GOODMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 75458 AND GOODMAN LAW GROUP, A
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, A
NEVADA CORPORATION,
Petitioners,
VS.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
FILED COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, MAY 1 5 2018 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ELIZABETH A BROW?/ CLERK OF SUPREME COURT CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE
DEPUTY' CLERK MICHAEL VILLANI, DISTRICT
JUDGE,
Respondents, and
KARINE PETROSYAN: AND
MARIANNA MINASYAN,
INDIVIDUALS,
Real Parties in interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR
WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBMON
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a contract action. We are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention at this early stage in the proceedings is warranted, particularly in light of the narrow basis for the district court's ruling. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist, Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849,
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A
LIZ .1' •Td. +, ii=laggii& Ate:. IMEIBIEMBIE • 411 851, 853 (1991). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
CLL.& )4/17 Cherry
Parraguirre Stiglich cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge
Palazzo Law Firm
Wright Stanish & Winckler
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A e 2
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.