Goodman v. Dist. Ct. (Petrosyan)
Goodman v. Dist. Ct. (Petrosyan)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ROSS C. GOODMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 75458 AND GOODMAN LAW GROUP, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, A NEVADA CORPORATION, Petitioners, VS.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILED COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, MAY 1 5 2018 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ELIZABETH A BROW?/ CLERK OF SUPREME COURT CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE DEPUTY' CLERK MICHAEL VILLANI, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and KARINE PETROSYAN: AND MARIANNA MINASYAN, INDIVIDUALS, Real Parties in interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBMON
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a contract action. We are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention at this early stage in the proceedings is warranted, particularly in light of the narrow basis for the district court's ruling. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist, Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A LIZ .1' •Td. +, ii=laggii& Ate:. IMEIBIEMBIE • 411 851, 853 (1991). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
CLL.& )4/17 Cherry
Parraguirre Stiglich
cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge Palazzo Law Firm Wright Stanish & Winckler Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A e 2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished