Allen v. Neuromonitoring Assoc.'s, Inc.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CHAD ALLEN, No. 75698 Appellant, vs.

NEUROMONITOR1NG ASSOCIATES,

INC., 4 ,441!

Respondent.

JUN 01 WY aptirtiTti:Li

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order confirming an arbitration award. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Ronald J. Israel, Judge. Our review of the docketing statement and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. Appellant filed a timely tolling motion in the district court on April 9, 2018, seeking to vacate the order challenged on appeal. See NEAP 4(a)(4); AA Primo Builders, LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 581-85, 1190, 1192-95 (2010) (describing when a post-judgment motion qualifies as a tolling motion). The notice of appeal was prematurely filed on April 22, 2018, before the tolling motion was resolved. To date, it appears that the tolling motion remains pending in the district court. Thus, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal, see

SUPREME COURT y_ OF

NEVADA e (0) I947A NRAP 4(a)(6) ("A premature notice of appeal does not divest the district court of jurisdiction."), and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSSED.'

, J.

Pickering

Gibboifs Hardesty cc: Hon. Ronald J. -Israel, District Judge

Chad Allen

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLR/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

'Appellant may file a new notice of appeal after a written order resolving the tolling motion has been entered.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A