Law v. State Bar of Nevada

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

STEPHEN LAW, No. 74291 Appellant, vs.

THE STATE BAR OF NEVADA; AND FILED BECKY ANN PINTAR,

Respondents JUN 1 i 2018 t A. ESOVils/ CLEO& OF PRaii.a: CO i t. BY liEPUT? CLEPX ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal of a letter from the State Bar informing appellant that his grievance against attorney Becky Pintar has been dismissed.

Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. It appears that the determination designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal of a letter from the State Bar dismissing a grievance. Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Cherry

4114 sCisk°46.1115r

Parraguirre Stiglich

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

I r. vvizet 0) I 94Th cc: Stephen Law

Pintar Albiston LLP

State Bar of Nevada/Las Vegas

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) IVE7A

In