Nevada Supreme Court, 2018

Las Vegas Rental & Repair, LLC Ser. 76 v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Las Vegas Rental & Repair, LLC Ser. 76 v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided June 15, 2018
Las Vegas Rental & Repair, LLC Ser. 76 v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LAS VEGAS RENTAL & REPAIR, LLC No. 71388 SERIES 76, A NEVADA LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY,

Appellant,

FILED vs.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Respondent. CL ELtZàö{A. BR:Vuhr ". tr- -DEPCLJEFIr w=m;u

ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT AND REMANDING This is an appeal from a district court order granting summary judgment in an action to quiet title. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kenneth C. Cory, Judge. Reviewing the summary judgment de novo, Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 Nev. 724, 729, 121 P.3d 1026, 1029 (2005), we vacate the district court's order and remand for further proceedings. Appellant argues that the district court erred in concluding that NRS 116.3116-.31168 violate due process. We agree. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 350 Durango 104 v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., 133 Nev., Adv. Op. 5, 388 P.3d 970 (2017) (rejecting due-process challenge to NRS 116.3116- .31168 because the nonjudicial foreclosure of an HOA's lien for unpaid assessments does not constitute state action); see also SFR Inv. Pool 1 v. U.S. Bank, 130 Nev. 742, 756, 334 P.3d 408, 418 (2014) (observing that NRS 116.31168 (2013) incorporated NRS 107.090 (2013), which required that notices be sent to a deed of trust beneficiary); id. at 762, 334 P.3d at 422 (Gibbons, C.J., dissenting) (same); Bourne Valley Court Tr. v. Wells Fargo

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) 1947A a Bank, NA, 832 F.3d 1154, 1163-64 (9th Cir. 2016) (Wallace, J., dissenting) (same).' Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court VACATED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.

J.

Gibbons

Hardesty cc: Hon. Kenneth C. Cory, District Judge

Michael H. Singer, Settlement Judge

Clark Newberry Law Firm

Smith Larsen & Wixom

Eighth District Court Clerk

1 We decline to consider the parties' arguments related to appellant's motion to strike because the district court did not decide the motion on its merits; rather, the district court denied the motion to strike as moot in light of its decision to grant summary judgment in respondent's favor.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

10) 947A

T

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.