Clark Cty. Credit Union v. Saunders, M.D.

Nevada Supreme Court

Clark Cty. Credit Union v. Saunders, M.D.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CLARK COUNTY CREDIT UNION, A No. 75355 DOMESTIC NON-PROFIT COOPERATIVE CORPORATION, Appellant, vs. YVONNE SAUNDERS, M.D., AN INDIVIDUAL; AND YVONNE SAUNDERS, M.D., LTD., A NEVADA JUN 15 2018 CORPORATIOIN, CL ETH A. BROWN Af/ OF 'LIPREME COURT Respondents. DEPIJTT CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion in limine to preclude admission of evidence. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Linda Marie Bell, Judge. Because it appeared that no final judgment had been entered, and the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable, this court entered an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We deferred ruling on respondents' motion to dismiss based on the same argument. Appellant has filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss, in which appellant argues that the order granting the motion in limine effectively served as a dispositive ruling in the case and should therefore be construed as a final judgment. Appellant further notes that a motion for summary judgment was heard on May 24, 2018, and appellant intends to appeal from that order. We conclude that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Moreover, no written order

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

( 0) 7A t resolving the motion for summary judgment has been entered by the district court; therefore NRAP 4(a)(6) does not apply. We ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'

Parraguirre

J. Stiglich

cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge Israel Kunin, Settlement Judge Bowen Law Offices Greene lnfuso, LIT Eighth District Court Clerk

'We deny as moot respondent's motion to dismiss. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2 (0) 194,A

Reference

Status
Unpublished