Reyes v. Dist. Ct. (Sanchez-Ramos)
Reyes v. Dist. Ct. (Sanchez-Ramos)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
YESENIA REYES; MIGUEL REYES; No. 76011 AND MARIA REYES, Petitioners, VS. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE GLORIA STURMAN, DISTRICT FILED JUDGE, JUL 2 0 2018 Respondents, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERKF SUPREME COURT and BY 5' LETICIA SANCHEZ-RAMOS; SANDRA DEPUTY CLERK
LOPEZ-ANGUIANO; AND SANDRA LOPEZ-ANGUIANO, AS PARENT AND GUARDIAN FOR VANESSA DIAZ- LOPEZ, A MINOR, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the denial of a demand for a jury trial in a tort action. Having considered the petition and appendices filed in this matter, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679,
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 947A 4Zep - WTI/ 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (observing that the decision to issue writ of mandamus "is purely discretionary"). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
J. Pickeri
Gibbons
J. Hardesty
cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge Browne Green, LLC Cram Valdez Brigman & Nelson Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished