Reyes v. Dist. Ct. (Sanchez-Ramos)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
YESENIA REYES; MIGUEL REYES; No. 76011 AND MARIA REYES,
Petitioners,
VS.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE
GLORIA STURMAN, DISTRICT
FILED JUDGE, JUL 2 0 2018 Respondents, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERKF SUPREME COURT and
BY 5' LETICIA SANCHEZ-RAMOS; SANDRA DEPUTY CLERK LOPEZ-ANGUIANO; AND SANDRA
LOPEZ-ANGUIANO, AS PARENT AND
GUARDIAN FOR VANESSA DIAZ-
LOPEZ, A MINOR,
Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This petition for a writ of mandamus challenges the denial of a demand for a jury trial in a tort action. Having considered the petition and appendices filed in this matter, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.160; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679,
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 947A 4Zep - WTI/ 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (observing that the decision to issue writ of mandamus "is purely discretionary"). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
J. Pickeri
Gibbons
J. Hardesty cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge
Browne Green, LLC
Cram Valdez Brigman & Nelson
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.