IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CURTIS LUNDY DOWNING, Petitioner, No. 75677 FILE vs. JUL 2 0 2018 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA; AND SANDY YOUNG, DEPUTY CLERK, Respondents. BY, DEPUTY C

CURTIS LUNDY DOWNING, No. 75678 Petitioner, vs. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA; AND SANDY YOUNG, DEPUTY CLERK, Respondents.

ORDER DENYING PETITIONS These original pro se petitions for a writ of mandamus challenge the respondent deputy clerk's decision to return unfiled petitions for rehearing as to orders denying motions to recall the remittiturs in Downing v. State, Docket Nos. 27734 and 32394. Having reviewed the documents before this court, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. See NRS 34.160; State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 127 Nev. 927, 931, 267 P.3d 777, 779-80 (2011) ("[T]he decision to entertain an extraordinary writ petition lies within our discretion."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petitions DENIED.

ekriA Pickering

fr41,40, Gibbons Hardesty

cc: Curtis Lundy Downing Attorney General/Carson City SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 194Th