Meisler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA MICHAEL CHARLES MEISLER, No. 75554
Appellant, vs,
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., A CORPORATION; AND KATHERINE MCFALL, AN INDIVIDUAL, FILE
Respondents.
'AUG 0 9 2018 "A,
A. -
B-RO-YRi nn kaga coutker
BY
REPOT CLERK ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from an order dismissing appellant's complaint as to two of the three named defendants. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Jerome M. Polaha, Judge.
Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the district court has not entered a final written judgment adjudicating all the rights and liabilities of all the parties, and the district court did not certify its order as final pursuant to NRCP 54(b). Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000); KDI Sylvan Pools v. Workman, 107 Nev. 340, 810 P.2d 1217 (1991); Rae v. All American Life & Gas. Co., 95 Nev. 920, 605 P.2d 196 (1979). Appellant's claims against Elizabeth Cuff appear to remain pending.
SUPREME COURT
OF NEVADA
- 3 7417
We conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'
Pickering
Gibboirs
L„ea Hardesty
, J. cc: Hon. Jerome M. Polaha, District Judge
Michael Charles Meisler Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk "We deny as moot appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the informal opening brief.
SUPREME COURT
OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.