Meisler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Nevada Supreme Court

Meisler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL CHARLES MEISLER, No. 75554 Appellant, vs, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., A CORPORATION; AND KATHERINE MCFALL, AN INDIVIDUAL, FILE Respondents. 'AUG 0 9 2018 "A,

A. - B-RO-YRi nn kaga coutker BY REPOT CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order dismissing appellant's complaint as to two of the three named defendants. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Jerome M. Polaha, Judge. Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the district court has not entered a final written judgment adjudicating all the rights and liabilities of all the parties, and the district court did not certify its order as final pursuant to NRCP 54(b). Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000); KDI Sylvan Pools v. Workman, 107 Nev. 340, 810 P.2d 1217 (1991); Rae v. All American Life & Gas. Co., 95 Nev. 920, 605 P.2d 196 (1979). Appellant's claims against Elizabeth Cuff appear to remain pending.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

- 3 7417 We conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'

Pickering

Gibboirs L„ea Hardesty , J.

cc: Hon. Jerome M. Polaha, District Judge Michael Charles Meisler Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk

"We deny as moot appellant's motion for an extension of time to file the informal opening brief. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2 (0) 1947A

117

Reference

Status
Unpublished