In Re: Discipline of Erik Severino
In Re: Discipline of Erik Severino
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF No. 76213 ERIK C. SEVERINO, BAR NO. 10221. FR.ED SEP 0 7 2018 ir:TH A. BROWN LI BY
ORDER IMPOSING RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE This is a petition under SCR 114 for reciprocal discipline of attorney Erik C. Severino, based on his reprimand in Arizona. Severino did not self-report his Arizona discipline as required by SCR 114(1) and he has not responded to the petition. See SCR 114(3).
Severino was reprimanded in Arizona on April 25, 2018.
Severino had expanded his law practice to Arizona and hired a non-attorney office manager as well as an Arizona-barred attorney. Severino admitted to the Arizona court that he failed to diligently manage the cases in that office; failed to properly supervise the office manager; allowed improper fee- splitting with the office manager; and, in at least one instance, accepted money from a client and then failed to perform any legal work. Based on these facts, Severino admitted to having violated Arizona rules of professional conduct equivalent to Nevada's RPC 1.3 (diligence); RPC 5.3(a) (responsibilities regarding nonlawyer assistants); RPC 7.2(n) (advertising: fee-splitting); and RPC 8.4(d) (misconduct prejudicial to the administration of justice). No aggravating or mitigating circumstances were found.
SCR 114(4) provides that this court shall impose identical reciprocal discipline unless the attorney demonstrates or this court finds SUPREME COURT OP NEVADA
(0) 1947A ADP-5 la -50e3Z__ that at least one of four factors is present: (1) the procedure in the other jurisdiction denied the attorney due process; (2) there is such an infirmity of proof of the misconduct in other jurisdictions that this court cannot accept the other court's decision; (3) substantially different discipline is warranted in this state; or (4) the established misconduct does not constitute misconduct under the rules of this state. None of the exceptions apply to this case and so we grant the petition for reciprocal discipline. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand Severino for his violations of the rules of professional conduct. The State Bar shall comply with SCR 121.1.
It is so ORDERED.
, C.J.
Douglas
Gibbons
„ea.Ain J.
Hardesty
, J.
Parraguirre'
cc: Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board Erik C. Severino Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Kimber K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, U.S. Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A cage,.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.