Canterbury v. U.S. Marshal Service
Canterbury v. U.S. Marshal Service
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RICHARD LEE CANTERBURY, No. 76606 Appellant, vs. UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE; UNITED STATES MARSHAL CARPENTER, CORECIVIC, HEALTH SEP 01 2018 CARE UNIT PHYSICIAN; AND ELIZAFJETH A. IIIFIJEIWAI CONTRACT PHYSICIAN DR. RUBEN CLE F SUPREME: COURT SAAVEDRA, BY b:.-Y-Ca.C144 EPUTY r - Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for default judgment. Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County; Kimberly A. Wanker, Judge.
Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable.
See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Brown v. MIK Stagecoach, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (U) 1947A rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion for default judgment. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we therefore ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.'
Pickering
toriu II , J.
Hardesty
CC: Hon. Kimberly A. Wanker, District Judge Richard Lee Canterbury Ruben Saavedra United States Marshal Carpenter Nye County Clerk
1 We note that the order denying the motion for default judgment is reviewable as interlocutory to the final judgment entered on July 18, 2018, and the final judgment is on appeal in Docket No. 76607.
We take no action on the motion filed September 6, 2018.
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (o) 1947A
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.