IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DANIELLA VALLEJO; AND ANGELINA No. 76368 VALLEJO, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; SEP 1 4 2018 AND THE HONORABLE WILLIAM D. CLEEItilee KEPHART, DISTRICT JUDGE, kETZPART. BY Respondents, EPUTY CLERK

and MARTA NEVINGER, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION This petition for a writ of prohibition challenges the district court's denial of a motion for reconsideration of a motion to quash service in a personal injury action. Having considered the petition and appendices filed in this matter, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."); Abreu v. Gilmer, 115 Nev. 308, 312, 985 P.2d 746, 749 (1999) (noting that the district court has discretion to make due diligence determinations in challenges to service of process). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Ct;_3q. ,J. SUPREME COURT Stiglich OF NEVADA / V- 3f9b (0) 1907A e k ILI cc: Hon. William D. Kephart, District Judge Atkin Winner & Sherrod The Schnitzer Law Firm Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2 (0) 1947A