Nevada Supreme Court, 2018

Stubbs v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

Stubbs v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided September 17, 2018
Stubbs v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA STEPHEN STUBBS, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 76764

Appellant, vs.

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, A POLITICAL FILED SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF NEVADA; AND LIEUTENANT SEP 1 7 2018

EUZABETH A. BROWN YASENIA YATOMI, INDIVIDUALLY, CLERK F SUPREME COURT

Respondents. BY •

TY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se' appeal from an order denying appellant's "Motion to Reopen Case, to Extend Period to Serve Defendants and to Stay this Case Pending Appeal." 2 Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the judgment or order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor lAppellant filed the notice of appeal through counsel Jared Richards of Clear Counsel Law Group. Appellant then filed a case appeal statement in pro se, informing this court that he is a licensed Nevada attorney in good standing with the State Bar of Nevada and explaining that he intends to proceed in pro se in this appeal. Accordingly, the clerk shall remove Jared Richards and Clear Counsel Law Group as counsel of record for appellant, and appellant shall proceed in pro se. See NRAP 46(e).

2Based on our review of the documents before this court, we direct the clerk of this court to amend the caption in this appeal to conform to the caption on this order.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

OF 1947A '451947. i -3(4,LSS- Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion to reopen a case or an order denying a motion for stay. See Brunzell Constr. Co. v. Harrah's Club, 81 Nev. 414, 404 P.2d 902 (1965). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Pickering Gibbon(

Se, itts;

Hardesty cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge

Stephen Stubbs Clear Counsel Law Group Marquis Aurbach Coffing Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA if /1 1947A PFS7T44

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.