IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DANIEL OMERZA; DARREN BRESEE; No. 76240 AND STEVE CARIA, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE OCT 1 2C13 RICHARD SCOTTI, DISTRICT JUDGE, CLEEltigTraci-21.C;:iciurc Respondents, BY DEPIITY GLER.i(7 . and FORE STARS, LTD.; 180 LAND CO., LLC; AND SEVENTY ACRES, LLC, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION OR MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a tort action. Having considered the petition and appendices filed in this matter, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344-45, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (observing that this court generally will not consider writ petitions challenging orders denying

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A / k go trs- 2_. motions to dismiss); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, C.J.

J.

J. Stiglich

cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP/Las Vegas EHB Companies, LLC The Jimmerson Law Firm, P.0 Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A cse