Mixon (Antonio) v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ANTONIO LEE MIXON, JR. No. 77206 Appellant, vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Respondent.
I rn. NOV 0 2 2018 EL El , ' A. 2P.OWN f CLE OF E: 'REME COUR .e) BY ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL [SERIF/ CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a pretrial motion to suppress. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michael Villani, Judge.
This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no statute or court rule allows a defendant to appeal from an order denying a pretrial motion to suppress evidence. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists); see also NRS 177.015(2) (only the state may appeal from an order granting or denying a pretrial motion to suppress). Accordingly, we conclude that lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Pr
Pickering
/ sA, Hardesty SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA it-4131Sr (0) 1947A ^0 cc: Hon. Michael Villani, District Judge
Antonio Lee Mixon, Jr.
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) I947A
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.