IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RONALD HILLMAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, No. 77387 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF anie, CLARK; THE HONORABLE ROB BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE; AND THE DEC 13 12i18 HONORABLE ADRIANA ESCOBAR, Arc)A7.7}1 A :Ar'71Y-Oirsl CLL re:I,: OF SUP'.E.t,ICL: COURT DISTRICT JUDGE, EY S YQ7-4,A—lt Respondents, DEPUTY Ci.L:PD

and SUSAN PROCTOR, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND KAY MEDRANO, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order that dissolves a partnership and directs the parties to sell the partnership's sole asset—an apartment located in another State. The petition primarily takes issue with whether the district court had jurisdiction to order the parties to sell the apartment. As such, the appropriate writ is for prohibition, not mandamus. Compare NRS 34.160 (scope of mandamus), with NRS 34.320 (scope of prohibition). Having considered the petition, we are not convinced that our intervention is warranted. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677,

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A e. 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) ("[T]he issuance of a writ of. . . prohibition is purely discretionary with this court."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Hardesty

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge The Law Office of Mike Beede, PLLC LBC Law Group Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A a