Braunstein (Steven) v. Dist. Ct. (Naunec-Miller)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, No. 77852 Petitioner, vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
CLARK,
FD Respondent, JAN and
ACTING COURT ADMINISTRATOR, A.
BY NAUNEC-MILLER; AND CLERK, DEPUTY Ct. STEVEN GRIERSON,
Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Additionally, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Gibbolis
/ J. Pickering Hardesty SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA /9- /22-sr"- (0) 1947A (izeel4L. cc: Steven Samuel Braunstein
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A -
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.