Anderson (Anthony) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ANTHONY K. ANDERSON, No. 77851 Petitioner, vs,
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FIILE CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE
MARK B. BAILUS, DISTRICT JUDGE,
Respondents, and
THE STATE OF NEVADA; ATTORNEY
GENERAL; AND BRIAN SANDOVAL,
Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Additionally, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Gibbon's iSecabets42\ Hardesty SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA /4941890 (0) I94Th cEDVA cc: Hon. Mark B. Bailus, District Judge
Anthony K. Anderson
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1907A D
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.