Nevada Supreme Court, 2019

Anderson (Anthony) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Anderson (Anthony) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided January 18, 2019
Anderson (Anthony) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ANTHONY K. ANDERSON, No. 77851 Petitioner, vs,

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FIILE CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE

MARK B. BAILUS, DISTRICT JUDGE,

Respondents, and

THE STATE OF NEVADA; ATTORNEY

GENERAL; AND BRIAN SANDOVAL,

Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Additionally, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Gibbon's iSecabets42\ Hardesty SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA /4941890 (0) I94Th cEDVA cc: Hon. Mark B. Bailus, District Judge

Anthony K. Anderson

Attorney General/Carson City

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1907A D

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.