Nevada Supreme Court, 2019

Lopez (Mario) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Lopez (Mario) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided February 1, 2019

Lopez (Mario) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MARIO ALEJANDRO LOPEZ, No. 77936 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK, FEB 0 1 2019 Respondent, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK Of SUPREME COURT and THE STATE OF NEVADA, BY DEPUTY CLERK Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Additionally, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J. iiec_tfretAti„ 3.

Hardesty

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (01 1947A 19-061I cc: Mario Alejandro Lopez Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A (401P>

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.