Ramirez (Miguel) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ, No. 78048 Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

ALE CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE FEB 0 8 2019 KATHLEEN E. DELANEY, DISTRICT

JUDGE, fl k BROWN

BY Respondents, DEPUTY CLERK and

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original pro se petition for a writ of review of pretrial proceedings in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Specifically, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4), Accordingly, without deciding upon the merit of any claims raised, we

ORDER the petition jaEINIED.

Pt / SO-A e-ere-4-t-■ Pickering Hardesty SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) 1947A caP

I- ofrI37 cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Miguel Angel Ramirez

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) I947A et°