Ramirez (Miguel) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Ramirez (Miguel) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
MIGUEL ANGEL RAMIREZ, No. 78048 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALE CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE FEB 0 8 2019 KATHLEEN E. DELANEY, DISTRICT JUDGE, fl k BROWN
BY Respondents, DEPUTY CLERK and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original pro se petition for a writ of review of pretrial proceedings in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Specifically, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review.
See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4), Accordingly, without deciding upon the merit of any claims raised, we ORDER the petition jaEINIED.
Pt / SO-A e-ere-4-t-■ Pickering Hardesty SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A caP I- ofrI37 cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Miguel Angel Ramirez Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A et°
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.