Hernandez (Esteban) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ESTEBAN HERNANDEZ, No. 78049 Petitioner, vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
CLARK, E- LB 0 8 2019 Respondent, EL CLE BRomi and BY BEPUTY CLERK THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of review of pretrial proceedings in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist, Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Specifically, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, without deciding upon the merit of any claims raised, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
tiett.-4—t ,J. Hardesty SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A /1 Obl Z - cc: Esteban Hernandez
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.