Hannah (Michael) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MICHAEL HANNAH, No. 78051 Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF I ED CLARK,

Respondent, FEB 0 8 2019 and CL ELI THE STATE OF NEVADA, BY DEPUTY CLERK Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Aditionally, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, without deciding upon the merit of any claims raised, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Pickering

0- Oki ',ID cc: Michael Hannah

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) I947A