State v. Dist. Ct. (Flynn (Dawnyell))

Nevada Supreme Court

State v. Dist. Ct. (Flynn (Dawnyell))

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

THE STATE OF NEVADA, No. 77745 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ate LU 2019 VALERIE ADAIR, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and DEPUTY CLERK DAWNYELL FLYNN, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order decision denying a motion to use the prior testimony of an unavailable witness. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J.

iSI NO CtI42.14:11 J. Parraguirre Cadish

cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Wright Stanish & Winckler Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

10) 194Th

MINEUT Ilia intitillta I'I t vllT

Reference

Status
Unpublished