State v. Dist. Ct. (Flynn (Dawnyell))
State v. Dist. Ct. (Flynn (Dawnyell))
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
THE STATE OF NEVADA, No. 77745 Petitioner, vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ate LU 2019 VALERIE ADAIR, DISTRICT JUDGE,
Respondents, and DEPUTY CLERK DAWNYELL FLYNN,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION This petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order decision denying a motion to use the prior testimony of an unavailable witness. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
J.
iSI NO
CtI42.14:11 J. Parraguirre Cadish cc: Hon. Valerie Adair, District Judge
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Wright Stanish & Winckler
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
10) 194Th
MINEUT Ilia intitillta I'I t vllT
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.