Carillo (Octavio) v. the Bd. of Parole Comm'rs

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

OCTAVIO CARILLO, No. 78123 Petitioner, vs.

THE BOARD OF PAROLE

COMMISSIONERS; THE STATE OF

NEVADA; ERIC CHRISTENSEN;

FILED MICHAEL REELER; MINERVA DE LA FEB 2 5 2019 TORRE; AND ADAM ENDEL, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT COMMISSIONERS, BY Respondents. DEPUTY CLEFtK

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in a criminal matter. Petitioner seeks to challenge the denial of parole. We are not satisfied this court's intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted at this time. Because petitioner's claim involves issues of fact, he should seek relief in the district court in the first instance. See Round Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 604, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981). Accordingly, without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

(3664 t'uf 11_, AA; Pickering Hardesty

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) 1947A ep

5 S LIS cc: Octavio Carillo

Attorney General/Carson City

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (t) 1947A enz•