Carillo (Octavio) v. the Bd. of Parole Comm'rs
Carillo (Octavio) v. the Bd. of Parole Comm'rs
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
OCTAVIO CARILLO, No. 78123 Petitioner, vs. THE BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS; THE STATE OF NEVADA; ERIC CHRISTENSEN; FILED MICHAEL REELER; MINERVA DE LA FEB 2 5 2019 TORRE; AND ADAM ENDEL, ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT COMMISSIONERS, BY Respondents. DEPUTY CLEFtK
ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in a criminal matter. Petitioner seeks to challenge the denial of parole. We are not satisfied this court's intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted at this time. Because petitioner's claim involves issues of fact, he should seek relief in the district court in the first instance. See Round Hill Gen. Improvement Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 604, 637 P.2d 534, 536 (1981). Accordingly, without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
(3664 t'uf 11_, AA; Pickering Hardesty
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A ep S LIS cc: Octavio Carillo Attorney General/Carson City
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (t) 1947A enz•
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.