Monroe (Daimon) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DAIMON MONROE, No. 78312 Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FU L CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ERIC

JOHNSON, DISTRICT JUDGE,

Respondents, ELI CLEP' s and BY THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). In particular, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/ Hardesty SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA jq.i uv1t' (0) 1947A e, cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge

Daimon Monroe

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A ,e04