Nevada Supreme Court, 2019

Triana (Eddy) v. State

Triana (Eddy) v. State
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided March 28, 2019

Triana (Eddy) v. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

EDDY TRIANA, A/K/A ERIC TRIAN, No. 74556 Appellant, vs. MED THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. MAR 2 8 2019 A. BROWN 1F ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE cy UPRE4.001

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, of driving under the influence (DUI) with one or more prior felony DUI convictions. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, Judge.

Appellant argues that his plea should be treated as a plea to a misdemeanor because the statutes in effect at the time of his previous DUI conviction have since been repealed and replaced. However, appellant failed to raise this argument below, and we decline to consider it in the first instance on appeal. See Rimer v. State, 131 Nev. 307, 328 n.3, 351 P.3d 697, n.3 (2015).

Next, appellant argues that his plea should be treated as a plea to a misdemeanor DUI because of the amount of time that has elapsed between his previous DUI conviction and the instant offense. To the extent appellant "references and incorporates" a document filed in the district court, Iplarties shall not incorporate by reference briefs or memoranda of law submitted to the district court or refer the Supreme Court. . . to such briefs or memoranda for the arguments on the merits of the appeal." NRAP 28(e)(2).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

ce, I 9 - /3 7 iv (0) 1947,n

7111 Appellant was previously convicted of misdemeanor driving under the influence, a second offense, after his offense was reduced pursuant to appellant's successful completion of a treatment program. See NRS 484C.340. Such a reduced conviction is specifically considered a valid prior conviction for purposes of driving under the influence with one or more prior felony DUI convictions. See NRS 484C.410(1)(e). There is no time limit within which the prior offense must have occurred; therefore, appellant's argument regarding the amount of time between his previous conviction and the instant offense does not warrant relief.

Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

t-ea--trh Hardesty

, J.

Stiglich

Silver

cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Mueller Hinds & Associates Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA in, 1947A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.