City of Las Vegas v. Dist. Ct. (Branscomb)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CITY OF LAS VEGAS, No. 77872 Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB

FILED BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, JUN 1 4 2019 Respondents,

ELIZABETH A. BPOWN and CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BRUCE BRANSCOMB, BY DEPUTY CLERK Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order reversing a misdemeanor conviction and remanding for a new trial. We are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (observing that decision to issue writ of mandamus "is purely discretionary"). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Hardesty

, J. Stiglich Silver SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A 0 ai - z ss o t cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge

Las Vegas City Attorney

Las Vegas City Attorney/Criminal Division Gentile, Cristalli, Miller, Armeni & Savarese, PLLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPPEME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947T cgREVF