Nevada Supreme Court, 2019

Wynn Resorts Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Bannister) C/W 78394

Wynn Resorts Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Bannister) C/W 78394
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided June 26, 2019
Wynn Resorts Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Bannister) C/W 78394

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

WYNN RESORTS LIMITED; JOHN J. No. 78381 HAGENBUCH; RAY R. IRANI; JAY L.

JOHNSON; ROBERT J. MILLER;

PATRICIA MULROY; CLARK T.

RANDT, JR.; ALVIN V. SHOEMAKER; J. EDWARD VIRTUE; D. BOONE

WAYSON; AND MATTHEW MADDOX,

Petitioners, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE JUN 2 6 2019 LINDA MARIE BELL, CHIEF

ELIZABETH A. BROWN DISTRICT JUDGE, CLERIkOr S=E C0URT By y 0\ e Respondents, DEPUTY CILERX CP and

BRUCE BANNISTER; LANA

TALAMAS; HOWARD MEADOWS;

GERALD OONIGIAN; LARRY CLERKS; JOE TILLOTSON; JOHN KALISH;

FLORENCE KALISH; MARVIN MYERS; WILLIAM CAPRONI; RODNEY V.

JOHN; A. LARAIN JOHN; CLIFFORD NAZZARO; AND LAWRENCE WEINER, Real Parties in Interest.

JOHN J. HAGENBUCH; RAY R. IRANI; No. 78394 JAY L. JOHNSON; ROBERT J.

MILLER; PATRICIA MULROY; CLARK T. RANDT, JR.; ALVIN V.

SHOEMAKER; J. EDWARD VIRTUE; D.

BOONE WAYSON; AND MATTHEW

MADDOX,

Petitioners, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

Surrtam Coml.

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE or

NEVADA aliSOP) (0) 1947A t ei -274t3 LINDA MARIE BELL,

Respondents, and

THOMAS DINAPOLI, DERIVATIVELY

ON BEHALF OF WYNN RESORTS

LIMITED,

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order striking petitioners peremptory challenge. Having considered the petition and supporting documentation, we conclude that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is not warranted. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition); State ex rel. Dep't Transp. v. Thompson, 99 Nev. 358, 362 662 P.2d 1338, 1340 (1983). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, J.

Hardesty

0 414G4-0 ,J ,J Stiglich Silver cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, Chief Judge

Snell & Wilmer, LLPfLas Vegas

Kirkland & Ellis LLPfLos Angeles

Kirkland & Ellis LLP/New York

Kemp, Jones & Coulthard, LLP

Eighth District Court Clerk

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.