Nevada Supreme Court, 2019

City of Las Vegas v. Dist. Ct. (Branscomb)

City of Las Vegas v. Dist. Ct. (Branscomb)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided June 14, 2019

City of Las Vegas v. Dist. Ct. (Branscomb)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CITY OF LAS VEGAS, No. 77872 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ROB FILED BARE, DISTRICT JUDGE, JUN 1 4 2019 Respondents, ELIZABETH A. BPOWN and CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BRUCE BRANSCOMB, BY DEPUTY CLERK Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order reversing a misdemeanor conviction and remanding for a new trial. We are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (observing that decision to issue writ of mandamus "is purely discretionary"). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Hardesty

, J.

Stiglich Silver SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 0 ai - z ss o t cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Las Vegas City Attorney Las Vegas City Attorney/Criminal Division Gentile, Cristalli, Miller, Armeni & Savarese, PLLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPPEME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947T cgREVF

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.