Hayes, Jr. (James) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Hayes, Jr. (James) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JAMES HOWARD HAYES, JR., No. 78622 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF AL CLARK, Respondent, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, CLE BY MAY 0 e..„ ■ S RO 51.: COURT ...
Ii Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). In particular, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review.
See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly. we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Pickering Hardesty
cc: James Howard Hayes, Jr. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA /9- /9395e (0) 1947A 457j74A Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 19474 e 2 :
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.