Monroe (Daimon) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Monroe (Daimon) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DAIMON MONROE, No. 78312 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FU L CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE ERIC JOHNSON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, ELI CLEP' s and BY THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). In particular, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
/ Hardesty SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA jq.i uv1t' (0) 1947A e, cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge Daimon Monroe Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A ,e04
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.