Nevada Supreme Court, 2019

Trejo (Renato) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Trejo (Renato) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided March 15, 2019
Trejo (Renato) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

RENATO L. TREJO, No. 78274 Petitioner, vs.

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT r)71 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE

DAVID M. JONES, DISTRICT JUDGE, ELVrET Respondents, CLERVIOP St. BY and

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). In particular, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) 1947A .0 ifq-flos-19 cc: Hon. David M. Jones, District Judge

Renato L. Trejo

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.