Trejo (Renato) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RENATO L. TREJO, No. 78274 Petitioner, vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT r)71 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE
DAVID M. JONES, DISTRICT JUDGE, ELVrET Respondents, CLERVIOP St. BY and
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition in a criminal matter. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). In particular, we decline to intervene because petitioner failed to submit an adequate appendix for our review. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(a)(4). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A .0 ifq-flos-19 cc: Hon. David M. Jones, District Judge
Renato L. Trejo
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA (0) 1947A
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.