Nevada Supreme Court, 2019

Allison, Curtis, Kingsley, Meoz, Michael & Sanchez v. Dist. Ct. (Faylona, M.D.)

Allison, Curtis, Kingsley, Meoz, Michael & Sanchez v. Dist. Ct. (Faylona, M.D.)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided March 15, 2019
Allison, Curtis, Kingsley, Meoz, Michael & Sanchez v. Dist. Ct. (Faylona, M.D.)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ALLISON, CURTIS, KINGSLEY, MEOZ, No. 78083 MICHAEL & SANCHEZ, D/B/A

COMPREHENSIVE CANCER

CENTERS OF NEVADA, A NEVADA

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION,

Petitioners, vs.

F g ri THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MAR 1 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ELIThernit. ".% ' CURT) IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE

MARK R. DENTON, DISTRICT JUDGE,

Respondents, and

EDGAR A. FAYLONA, M.D., AN

INDIVIDUAL; GILBERT NYAMUSWA,

M.D., AN INDIVIDUAL; RUSSELL P

GOLLARD, M.D., AN INDIVIDUAL;

MCKESSON CORP., A CALIFORNIA

CORPORATION; US ONCOLOGY, INC.,

A DELAWARE CORPORATION; AND

RMCC CANCER CENTER, LLC, A

DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY

COMPANY,

Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to consolidate two actions. Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not convinced that petitioners have met their burden of demonstrating that our intervention is warranted, see Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004), and therefore, we decline to exercise our

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

I 1 - IITS7 (07 194/A discretion in this matter. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J. Hardesty k_Aj,fc. J. Stiglich

J. Silver cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge

Kolesar & Leathern, Chtd.

Pisanelli Bice, PLLC

Gewerter & Dowling

Hymanson & Hymanson

Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA (0) 1947A e

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.