Nevada Supreme Court, 2019

Allison, Curtis, Kingsley, Meoz, Michael & Sanchez v. Dist. Ct. (Faylona, M.D.)

Allison, Curtis, Kingsley, Meoz, Michael & Sanchez v. Dist. Ct. (Faylona, M.D.)
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided March 15, 2019

Allison, Curtis, Kingsley, Meoz, Michael & Sanchez v. Dist. Ct. (Faylona, M.D.)

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ALLISON, CURTIS, KINGSLEY, MEOZ, No. 78083 MICHAEL & SANCHEZ, D/B/A COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTERS OF NEVADA, A NEVADA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, Petitioners, vs. F g ri THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MAR 1 COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, ELIThernit. ".% ' CURT) IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MARK R. DENTON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and EDGAR A. FAYLONA, M.D., AN INDIVIDUAL; GILBERT NYAMUSWA, M.D., AN INDIVIDUAL; RUSSELL P GOLLARD, M.D., AN INDIVIDUAL; MCKESSON CORP., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; US ONCOLOGY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; AND RMCC CANCER CENTER, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Real Parties in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to consolidate two actions. Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not convinced that petitioners have met their burden of demonstrating that our intervention is warranted, see Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004), and therefore, we decline to exercise our

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA I 1 - IITS7 (07 194/A discretion in this matter. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

J.

Hardesty

k_Aj,fc. J.

Stiglich

J.

Silver

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Kolesar & Leathern, Chtd.

Pisanelli Bice, PLLC Gewerter & Dowling Hymanson & Hymanson Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A e

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.