Nevada Supreme Court, 2019

Steele v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

Steele v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n
Nevada Supreme Court · Decided March 8, 2019

Steele v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

KATHY CARLENE STEELE, No. 78111 Appellant, vs. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR EMC MORTGAGE MAR 8 2i LOAN TRUST 2005-A, MORTGAGE CLE1'O SEir f' c' EflyK LAON PASS-THROUGH BY CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-A, Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying appellant's request to file a motion for leave to amend judgment. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Kathleen M. Drakulich, Judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appears that the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable.

See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A a(Cip rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a request to file a motion.

Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Hardesty a

Aitt.thau.-0 Nat.

Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Kathleen M. Drakulich, District Judge Kathy Carlene Steele Holland & Hart LLP/Las Vegas Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.