Taylor (Danny) v. the Eleventh Dist. Ct.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DANNY TAYLOR, No. 78989 Petitioner, vs. THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF

FILED PERSHING, JUL 0 3 2019 Respondent. ELIZABET1-1& EROWN

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY

DEPUTY CLERKU

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to follow the instructions of the Court of Appeals of the State of Nevada, as set forth in Taylor v. State, Dep't of Corr., Docket No. 72981 (Order Affirmed in Part, Reversed in part, and Remanding, May 9, 2018).

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support Ms claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition").

Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A mat.

88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) CPetitionerí 1 Carl-56S] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.").

Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Piekutii J.

Pickering Hardesty cc: Danny Taylor

Attorney General/Carson City Pershing County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A cagibm

•••• •